![]() ![]() The consensus opinion of modern scholarship is that Daniel is an apocalyptic book written in the mid-second century B.C. The reference to Daniel in Ezekiel is also a highly contentious debate, but it does seem that Ezekiel is referring to three wise people from three distinct periods of history, Noah at the flood, Job at the time of Abraham, and a contemporary Daniel. He rejects claims that Ezekiel refers to a mythological Danel in the Ugaritic epic “The Tale of Aqhat.” Miller arguing it is unlikely for Ezekiel to cite an Ugaritic wise man favorably while condemning idolatry in Judah. This argument may be part of an inductive argument pointing toward the possibility of an earlier date, but it is not certain proof.įor Stephen Miller, the three references to Daniel in Ezekiel (14:14, 20 28:3) is the strongest argument for the early date of Daniel ( Daniel, NAC 18, 42–43). As Goldingay points out, however, we have almost no information on what was or was not canonical in the first century BC and it is anachronistic to impose later canonical guidelines on the Dead Sea Scrolls. For conservatives, this argues for an earlier date since it seems unlikely Daniel would be considered canonical only 40 years after it was written. One of the manuscripts can be dated to about 120 B.C., only a generation or so after the events recorded in the latter chapters of the book. for pointing this out, see the response below!) Goldingay seems to overstate his case here, including allusions to Daniel in other manuscripts such as 4QFlorilegium or the Prayer of Nabonidus. Although some of these fragments are very small, there are more” copies of Daniel than any other book in the Hebrew Bible” (Goldingay, Daniel 2, 99). One compelling factor is the presence fragments of nearly every chapter of Daniel among the Dead Sea Scrolls. The first six chapters of the book are stories about Daniel and make no claim to be written by Daniel himself. Although Daniel 7-12 is in the first person, there is no clear claim that Daniel himself is the author. The book would have been completed after 537 BC, the last date recorded in the Daniel. The traditional view is that Daniel was written at the end of the sixth century or early in the fifth century, soon after Daniel’s death. For most in the academy, “no serious commentator” would consider an earlier date. But the later date for the book is a similar test of one’s scholarly credentials. This is a highly contentious debate because conservatives tend to make the date of Daniel a litmus test for conservative orthodoxy. For many others Daniel is an apocalyptic re-casting of current events from the perspective of the middle of the second century B.C. For some readers Daniel is predictive prophecy made by a historical figure. The answer to this question touches on the genre of Daniel and the clear prediction of historical events leading up to the Maccabean Revolt and possibly the Roman Empire in the first century. ![]() One of the more difficult questions for studying the book of Daniel is when the book was written. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |